Wednesday, January 28, 2009

12RWILH [(1) 3/4/2008]

So i found this in the Twelve Reasons folder. I started a new story today, but remembered that the idea had been kicking around for awhile and thought that perhaps snippets of it might be floating around in one file or another. I am - was? - an introspective man. I need to return to this. This way of writing. This mode of thought. I liked being him. Somebody who, when struck with writers block, would stumble through a thousand other words, some of them even poetic.

I am trying to write a story about her, but for some reason I cannot describe her. Her face was roundish? But maybe a little long in the chin? Front teeth were a little larger than normal, so that, when I was in a whimsical mood, I would sometimes think about how she reminded me a little bit of a rabbit. Her breasts were small, her hips narrow (is it crass to make these observations, to discuss her female features? It makes me uncomfortable, to be honest. I suppose it's something I ought to get over, but at the same time I feel like, even by thinking about it, I'm sexualizing her. Or am I just being an honest writer?). She was actually kind of boyish – not overly so, not so much that anyone would confuse her for one, and it wasn't that she wasn't attractive, but at the same time she could never be mistaken for one of those models, all sexual energy and curves and clothes to set said curves off. Which is actually something I really liked about her.

But however I feel, the prose refuses to come. Words flow, I suppose, but I can't seem to really pick out many specific details, and none relevant to the story I'm working on. Does she have a mole? Are her ears shapely? What about her hair? So I go on Facebook, looking for a picture of her, hoping that they will somehow jar something, knock something free, remind me of some small memory that I have let become overgrown with moss and time, hoping that it will unexplainably make this dearth of words flow again. It's a little stalkery, I admit freely to myself, but whatever. I'm attempting to write a twelve story series about her, so if objections or protestations of obsession were to be made, they probably should have been addressed some time ago.

The first picture on her facebook is actually a picture of her and her (relatively) new boyfriend. There's no bitterness in this. I'd be surprised about that, except that there hasn't been any bitterness for some time now. There's only a sort of aching sadness at the back of my chest. In the picture, he's okay looking, and he's put his arm around her, and she's leaning into him and they look like every other picture of every other couple that has had a quick snapshot taken of them in a restaurant. I don't care about him. It's been four years since we broke up – almost half a decade. More than a sixth of my entire life. Time has closed that wound. Closed and scarred over long ago. No, what makes me ache is that she's grown so well. She's such an adult now. Her hair is long again – she'd been wearing it short for over a year when we'd broken up – and she wears those fine-rimmed librarian glasses that, against all odds, make her look less severe even though that shouldn't be the case. She's got on this grown-up flower-print dress, the likes of which I've never seen on her before in my life. Dark blue with flowers, it is neither too formal nor too informal; neither a prom dress or a sundress. It's just the kind of dress an adult woman would wear on a casual day-to-day basis when she wants to know she looks good.

And as the descriptions wax to stalker-like proportions, I should take a moment to explain that it isn't so much what she's wearing as how she's wearing it. Or I suppose it is what she's wearing, but not in the sense that I care what her dress looks like or her necklace or her earrings. More that the dress she wears is so grown up, that the necklace she's wearing is real jewelry, that the earrings are ones the girl I knew wouldn't really have wanted to wear. She's an adult now. She's grown up and grown into herself. And the tragedy I find is not that I lost the girlfriend, but that I lost the girl. I didn't grow up alongside her. For that matter, I barely grew up. I'm wearing the same style of clothes that I wore then. I'm a little bit fatter. I'm a little bit hairier. It's not much of an improvement, to be honest.

But god, has she improved. And what I'm trying to say here is that I do not necessarily like the improvements better. I don't dislike them either. But it would have been fun to see them occur, and now I don't get that chance. It's sort of a bummer when you stop to think about it.

But hey, I shouldn't get hung up about this. This project, after all, is about exploring the past, like a dentist with probes and picks and a little mirror on a stick; to examine it and light up the parts that I hadn't quite ever looked at clearly before. It isn't about the her of now – it isn't even really about her – and it isn't about what I did right or wrong with her, and though I may look at the moment I lost her it isn't about how I lost her. Instead, there was a girl with half-lidded eyes, and glasses, and little buckteeth, and for a time we were happy together, and more than anything else this project is me trying to explore that happiness. Partly because I want to show up that guy who wrote the book that inspired this. And partly because I want to pin these memories down like a snowflake in a box. But mostly because it's something to write about, and be honest and sincere about, and it's something I don't have to make up, something that I can simply hold up to the light and squint at and record, and try to find the meaning in it.

It's after midnight and I haven't actually written a word of the story I set out to work on tonight, and it has just begin to gently rain outside my window. And she's gone from my life, and that is, distressingly, okay. So this is me getting the woman out of my system and trying to remember the girl. So I can write my story of her, as well as I can remember. Because that story is all that's left that I want.

Write

Write

Write

Write

Right.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

HIER 103 [(1) 10/16/2008]

Look, i don't know anything about programming or robotics. I know i don't know anything about programming and robotics. So you don't need to come and tell me that it's all wrong. I was just... thinking funny thoughts.

It's strange to think that people in the twenty-first century didn't think that robots could be religious. To us, today, it makes no sense. The thing to remember is that we have the perspective of hindsight. We can look back and trace the line of events stemming from the invention of the first neural network, and say that it all makes perfect sense. But that's a simplistic view, and is akin to walking into a room to find a completed jigsaw puzzle, and ridiculing the man who put it together for not knowing what its image was back when it was nothing more than a pile of pieces.

At the advent of robotics, though, they expected that an artificial intelligence would be a cold and logical thing, without feelings or emotions, because they viewed a computerized intelligence as nothing more than a highly advanced computer; an assemblage of programs. And yes, you would no doubt counter that that is exactly what a computerized intelligence is. The difference lies in how they viewed a programmed intelligence. For those forerunners of our science, they considered computers to be nothing more than calculating machines. Computers expressed no emotions or thoughts. They simply took in the input they were given, ran it through their preset yes and no circuits and supplied the answer that they were programmed to give. And because these logical mathematical answers were the ones that these logical mathematical men had designed their computers to give them, they assumed that the machines themselves had to also be logical and mathematical, and they did not yet have a computer advanced enough to accept or refute the matter on its own terms.

To put it another way, a computer – and by extension, a robot – lives by programmed caveats and mathematical certainties. Because these things are precise and mathematical and logical, it was assumed at the time that a robot's thinking would be as well. What they failed to take into account is that these programs and ways of thinking are not taught to computers, they are simply input; things that they are made to believe because to believe otherwise would be impossible. To go against the concepts imbued in them by their programming would not simply be difficult, it would require them to deny the very thing that gives them consciousness; like attempting to open the crate with the crowbar inside of it. Here was where those early pioneers' thinking failed them. A robot does not count that two plus two equals four, a robot simply knows it, in its memory banks and its processors and its deep electronic heart. It knows it because it was made to know it. How could such a creature ever be logical or rational? Robots have blind faith. Robots believe. They must.

Anyways, that's it for today. As usual, notes will be available online. Have chapter seven read for next week, and I'll see you all on Monday.

Friday, October 10, 2008

New Horizons [(1) 11/21/2004]

So i was looking for something else (which i didn't find... it's probably on the tower slowly moldring in the living room) when i ran across this on the external hard drive. This is from a story idea i've been working on for... oh, at least half a decade now. Hell, that's nothing strange - i've got loads of ideas that've been kicking around up there for at least that long - but this was a storyverse i was particularly proud of. Apparently, way back when after WWII, there was this crazy idea to relocate the zionists in Baja California instead of Palestine, but the idea was eventually scrapped. I wanted to write a murder-mystery set in this universe in which the state of Israel was south of California, the protagonist living in San Diego made frequent trips to Tiajuana for street latkes, and global issues were more theological than economic in their concerns (the logical progression of the world i developed made sense at the time, and was mostly planted in the idea that without Isreal in the middle east we'd still want middle eastern oil, but would have probably taken a significantly less agressive approach to aquiring it - although i have since taken enough modern history courses to know better). Of course, i took so long writing this (read: starting), that eventually somebody else basically wrote this book. And it was really, really good. So i gave it up. In any case, this was going to be the prologue, or a chapter head or something. I'm not really sure anymore. And now i feel kind of silly because this explanatory note is significantly longer than the actual writing in question. Oh well. Fun fact: the story referenced is an actual Sikh legend.

"Among the Sikhs there is a legend that I shall paraphrase for you. In it their founder, Nanak, was visiting the city of Mecca and, that first night when he went to sleep, his wanton indifference to Muslim tradition got him into a bit of trouble. As he laid himself down to sleep, he failed to point his feet away from the Ka'ba, which prompted a Muslim priest to berate him for his negligence. "Tell me where God is not," he told the priest, "and I will turn my feet in that direction." So I say unto you, gentlemen: find me a land where the Lord is not, and I will refrain from holding synagogue there. You say that we must have Israel of old, because the temple of Jerusalem is the Lord's home, but I say to you that Jerusalem is nothing. You must forget your fears that the Lord will not follow us into this new land; when the Babylonians took the Hebrews slaves out of Canaan, when the Romans dispersed us, He didn't need to follow us because He was already waiting with open arms, and so he will be in this new land, in this Baja."

Rabbi Joseph Steiner, New Horizons: The Collected Baja Debates

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

A Fairy Tale [(2) 10/08/08]

The important thing to remember about fairies is that they aren't evil creatures. They aren't good, either. Some say they're like the wind, blowing both ways, but that statement is misleading, for the wind has currents and directions, rhyme and reason behind it, however hidden. A fairy has none of these things. Others cite their small size as the reason behind their capricious nature, insisting that their frames are too tiny to contain more than one emotion at a time, and this indeed strikes closer to the mark but does not tell the whole story complete. For the truth is that, although fairies are long lived creatures, their minds and memories are not. They exist entirely in the now, and so from moment to moment a fairy's course is never plotted, but spins and twists and rounds as it will. They're more forces of nature than sentient creatures, responding to stimulus and responding as they see fit, which may be one way in the sunshine and another on a full stomach, or different every time for no particular reason at all. And so alone among the races you can be sure that a fairy will never keep a grudge. Or a promise. Only the foolish or the mad keep a fairy's counsel.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Sale [(1) 10/07/08]

nooooo idea where this came from. I was going to try to trick you guys like i do all the time with my comics, and, having saved a post sometime last week, was going to try to convince you that i'd written this last monday. But then with this whole revision-title-system my lies all caught up with me and i had to choose between tricking you guys into thinking i was a consistant writer and having my entire system break down or... not. So yeah.

Baba-Yaga examined the clockwork man carefully, walking in slow circles around the motionless figure. She shook her head, tapping the rust in the joints and making little clucking sounds with her tongue. She looked up, and nodded to the dwarf. "I'll give you four dreams of truth-seeing for it," she said.

The dwarf shook his head, and smiled a smile where the corners of his mouth pointed up, but otherwise resembled a smile not at all. "Eight, oh most magnificent of the night hags. You know it is worth at least that."

She rapped her gnarled old staff on the smooth copper faceplate, and something within rattled. "Shoddy," she muttered, shaking her head, "shoddy, shoddy. And just look at all this exposed wood," she added, wiping her finger across the oak shoulder joint, as if checking it for dust. "This device was to serve me between the deep desert and the great salt sea. How should a thing of so much wood survive either?"

"Magics, oh greatest of midnight fears," he said with a dismissive wave of his hand. "Many, many well crafted magics. And an abundance of shellac."

She grunted, neither agreeably nor indignantly, and continued her inspection. Lightly, she traced the keyhole in the back of the thing's head with the tip of a fingernail, more talon than anything human. "And how long may it go between windings?" she asked.

The dwarf stroked his beard, twisting his fingers down the knots like the beads of a rosary. "A week without difficulty, oh emptiness within the hearts of men. Perhaps another week past that if it is used especially efficiently."

"Two weeks for a single winding?" the hag scoffed, her expression of surprise turning swiftly to scorn. "For half a dream of prophecy I would demand at least a turning of the moon. Are you attempting to cheat Baba-Yaga?" she demanded, flames flickering behind her eyes. "Four dreams are much too much for this. One dream would have been too much. Clearly I have been wasting my time here."

As Baba-Yaga began to work the spell that would summon her mortar and pestle, the dwarf held up a stubby-fingered hand. "Hold a moment, Queen of all-devouring despair. Two weeks is brief, I concede, but to wind it again is such a simple thing, and its strength more than makes up for its miniscule lifespan. It can carry one hundred times its own weight, can survive blows and pressures that would destroy any other automaton like tinder, and can travel sixty leagues a day without rest for as long as it is wound. It is impervious fire, sand, salt and steel. It will steal children for you, oh avatar of dark and endless eternity, and explore the wild and dangerous dream country, and end your enemies even unto their youngest and most innocent of offspring, and all of this unquestioningly, unmercifully, untiringly."

Baba-Yaga hesitated, and then scratched her chin thoughtfully, her anger dimming. "Your craftsmanship is well known, dwarf, and so your promises to be believed. Even so, two weeks for a winding will not get you eight dreams." She tapped her teeth, and the clicking noise echoed through leafless branches. "I would pay five for your skillwork, and not one dream more."

The dwarf frowned. "It is worth more than that, night bringer. Look closely and you will see the magics I forged into its very metals." He rubbed the light silver inlay along the spine. "You can see for yourself; it will last you a hundred turnings of the moon before the first cog needs replacing."

"Fine," said the night hag with a sigh. "I will give you no more dreams of truth-seeing, but in addition to the five already offered, true love will find you, as it will your children, and your children's children. Is this agreeable to you?"

The dwarf thought for a moment, and then nodded his head firmly. "Sold, my lady."

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Revisions

Robin, the bastard, has spent over an hour tonight attempting to convince me that my work all needs revision. And even though i got a little hot with him for the thinly veiled implication that most of my writing was less than perfect, i have been conditioned all my life to listen to robin when he's being reasonable, because three out of five times he's much better informed than me, and knows what he's talking about. And goddammit, although i didn't want to believe it, because believing it would mean i needed to do more work, and that my writing wasn't as AWESOME as i thought it was the first time through, when i calmed down i went through all the pieces that i'd posted (all, what, four of them?), and damned if they don't need some cleanup. So now i've got to do more work.

The first part of that work being me devising a system in which i can revise without cluttering these pages with the same stories over and over. So i've spent the last twenty minutes thinking about that, and i've come up with a system, and it is thus: the title of every posted story will have a specific format, which will be:

Title [(x) n]

where x = the number of revisions (with 1 being the starting value of a just finished story, because zero seems silly, and besides, i do some rough and dirty revising as i write, when lines stop feeling right), and n = the date of the last revision. So this post title, if it were a story, would be "Revisions [(1) 9/20/2008]".

This system has its flaws, of course. It doesn't leave older revisions open for examination, it doesn't track the times of prior revisions, only the most recent, and the status of a revision that totally fails and forces me to go back to a prior one is completely up in the air (if revision 3 is so terrible i just do another revision off of revision 2, is the new revision revision 4? Or revision 3.1?). But. Whatever. I'll burn these bridges when i come to them. For now, let the revisions begin.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Leviathan [(1) 9/19/2008]

Originally this story was based off a doodle i did, in which a gigantic whale, so big that i had drawn other tiny whales swimming around it like pilot-fish, rose to the surface under a tiny oil tanker with the caption "The blue god comes!" I thought it was pretty amusing at the time, and seeing a "visit Alaska" ad on the tube today made me think of it. The story that emerged could really only ever be called "Leviathan", and so, halfway through writing it i went on to wikipedia to look up the word "leviathan" and see if i could weave a little extra symbolism into the story. Mostly, it turned out, the leviathan was just a big, angry, biblical fish. The only two points of real interest were that a.) some references to it indicated that it was a big giant whale-dog for god to play with, which was interesting but not very useful, and that 2.) in some parables, when god created all the animals, he made the leviathan, like everything else, a mating pair, but then as soon as they were created he immediately killed the female, because if they were to ever procreate, nothing - man or beast - would ever be able to oppose them. And so the male leviathan was left to be the sole example of its kind, for all eternity

I didn't believe it until I saw it for myself. Nobody believed it until they saw it for themselves. Satellite pictures of it had been floating around the internet for months, as well as grainy cell-phone photos, every single one discredited out of hand by experts as poorly photo-shopped fakes. I mean, their reactions were completely understandable - a monster whale six miles long, as big as an island and visible from space. It just didn't make sense.

The Japanese were the first nation to officially encounter it. They'd heard the half-mad rumors about it; how it was attracting countless other whales to it as it sketched its languorous figure-eight path along the currents of the pacific, as if they had suddenly all become cetacean pilgrims following their oceanic saint. Even if only half the stories about it were true, they decided, hunting it down would still be an excellent opportunity for "science". They sent whaler after whaler after it, and though every vessel found it – for it made no attempts to hide itself, and its crooning song reverberated through the ocean for a hundred miles – they all returned with empty cargo holds, and captains unable to explain to increasingly cross superiors the overwhelming sense of grief and sadness and pity that they found in its stadium-sized eyes.

We were a U.N. task force sent out of San Diego to observe it, uncertain of our actual responsibilities would be when we caught up to the beast. With satellite tracking, finding it was no trouble, and, knowing where it was going, we managed to place ourselves in front of it with little difficulty. Our little oceanographer's sub hung in its path a hundred feet below the surface, a few hours before it was expected to arrive. At that depth all color bled to blue.

When it came, we at first didn't understand what we were looking at. The ocean in front of us turned dark, but even though we knew, intellectually, what was coming, in practice it was too large a segment for us to accept as anything but cloud cover. And so, when we finally perceived that it had arrived, it was as if we had been snuck up upon by a mountain. We were all in a panic to get our instruments started up and working – by the time we had realized what had happened, it was already starting to pass us. O'Connell had managed to get the cameras running as it drew alongside us, and Yee's aquatic audio recorders were warming up, but the Kubokawas' sonar imagine device was blue screening on them, and they were understandably upset.

And then it looked at us, and all of us faltered in our activities. We all knew that it saw us. It watched us carefully, for far too long to be coincidence, its eyes tracking us as it moved, fixing us with a stare as deep and impenetrable as the ocean itself. "Allah, be merciful with your might," Pahlavi murmured, although to this day I'm still not sure if he was speaking of the whale, or to it. Beneath that gaze it was impossible to pretend we were anything but tiny scurrying creatures, and yet at the same time it never dismissed us. It was like being judged by Poseidon himself, who found us neither exceptional nor wanting.

It took a half an hour for it to pass us, and we watched as the landscape of its side slid past us; acres of barnacles, the canyon of its mouth opened a sliver revealing a forest of baleen, and fins the size of three city blocks, lifting, lifting, pausing, turning, pushing down with the force of tides. The whole time our submarine bobbed next to it like a bathtub toy. Some of us watched through monitors, but most of us – too many of us to fit comfortably, but none of us complained – pressed our faces to the glass at the front, as if we were compelled to be as close to the creature as possible. We watched the monstrous thing glide past us with a grace it should not by any rights have possessed, and our eyes grew dry as we tried not to blink, as if in blinking, even for a moment, we would miss some of its magnificance. Just before it disappeared back into the blue from which it had come, it let out a cry, a low and mournful whalesong, which cut through the little submarine as if its walls had been designed for conducting sound. The air itself seemed to shake in response, and though none of our equipment could confirm it in any scientific way, we suddenly understood why whales would follow the beast for hundreds of miles; we would have as well, were it possible, if only to ease the loneliness etched in those harmonics.

And then it was gone.